Useful Idiots Demand Publication of UI Krugman's Personality Profile

 Clotilde Frazier (c) January 11, 2011 - revised 1-27-2011

UI Krugman's Personality: A Report to the Comrades

From A  domestic communist cell: new conditioning goals based on UI Krugman's (quantified) personality chart.

Greetings Comrades: We have worked out past kinks involving the historical Masonic One-World-Order and were thrilled with the music that accompanied our farewells.

Unfortunately, UI (Useful Idiot)  Paul Krugman has been outed. His outing has served to spoil our one-hundred percent, nondiscriminatory, hug-hug, civil meeting, making other UIs one-hundred percent hopping mad and uncivil.  

We must find a way to scrutinize Comrade Krugman for personality deficiencies. To this end, we have quantified UI Krugman's personality for illegal profiling purposes in the event that we need to dispose, I mean, elim..., I mean discard unwanted traits. We have a final solution in place, if needs arise.  

Background:

We are concerned that Comrade Krugman, et al., has caused an alarm bell to sound among American Conservatives, some of whom are  senior citizens. We must change our conditioning strategies as we sift for personality weaknesses.

Problem 1:  The Tea-Party's older fools are speaking out about their health care needs and costs.  Usually silent, they are telling the nation exactly how much our splendid Ponzi-like Medicare scheme really costs them. 

Problem 2: The  seniors and Conservatives  are not cowed by our Committee's efforts to blame them and Sarah Palin for the recent murders and mayhem in Arizona. In fact, our UI,  Paul Krugman, et al has been partially exposed as an UI by bright bloggers and talk show hosts.  It doesn't end there.

Problem 3:  Our formerly quiet radical neocon friends failed to successfully moderate the rising conservative tide. 

Problem 4:  While Krugman's thinking and personality are skillful and representative of best mole practices in Communist thinking, his occasional lack of objectivity places him at risk when he's confronted by objective thinkers in the conservative movement.

Problem 5: UI (PK) is unable to insert himself at will within groups of unsuspecting conservatives to a degree that would allow them to trust him.

Problem 6:  the Committee for UI (Useful Idiot) Control (CUIC) studied Comrade Krugman's commentaries, and has detected covert, uncivil willfulness in his personality structures. 

There is also a desirable one-sided propensity, which  leads to above-average  subjectivity.  Put another way, he sees life on his terms sixty-percent of the time, often making him useful and corruptible.  Conversely, forty-percent of the time he may be curious about others, allowing in some human concerns. We must apply conditioning strategies to extinguish him, I mean these tendencies.  Details about profiling techniques are not allowed for the purposes of this report.  The author's original intent was to empower individuals.  Of course, we found a way around her intents.  

Comments: Normally UI PL's predispositions  are good Communist characteristics, but with the rise of Christian, spiritually-driven Conservatism, PK has to improve think-out-of-the-box strategies that are at once civil,  conversely evil, and full lies.   

By coming out of the shadows, he has drawn the ire of many "civil" Americans, who must again in mass be painted as "uncivil." We can only hope that they will not form more consciences as we regroup.

Klugman's Personality's Theoretical Characteristics:

Self vs. Me" Ratios

Looking at his primary mode of functionality, UI (PK) can be expected at any  time to demonstrate a below the median "self" or "me" frame of reference. He draws from these levels at least sixty-three percent of the time.

This means his personality is commendably narcissistic for UIs.  Our hope is to teach him to ignore secondary drives which cause him to consider "Others." These mixed 6:4 types give us a headache. Reconditioning as you know is difficult. Nonetheless we must force, I mean, urge UI PK to go along in order to get along.

Extinguishing "Others" or larger world views in UI Krugman's mission modes is a problematic situation: on the surface, UI's must appear Christian or Christian-like, yet actually be narcissistically destructive  at least ninety-percent of the time.   

Since UI Krugman allowed himself to be exposed, we must consider how to manipulate other personality drives; wherein, he is functioning in the "other"

modes,  wherein he is curious about others, as well as their thoughts and needs.  

Overt vs Covert Behavioral Modes

Our concern with UI (PK) Krugman is that  while he primarily has  a one-hundred percent  inclination to function in the shadows (covertly), that drive may at times be diminished to forty-percent by secondary (overall) drives.  During these times, he may blink or change, move to a sincere status, and/or  care too much and blow his cover.  It is our job to repress these inclinations.

To the point, UI (PK) can function in the self mode at least six out of ten times but we may be able to train him in a Pavlovian manner to reinforce stronger "self" frames of reference. As we consider reeducation, it is prudent to remember that we don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.  Finding one-hundred percent primary "coverts" who are "self" focused is time consuming because we don't have a complete data base.

Leader, Organizer, Communicator Drives

UI, Paul Krugman is essentially a Leader. Communication drives are used to that end. This will essentially propel him to be a  true believer in the marriage of Utilitarianism and  Pragmatism.  If lying works, use it, in all contexts.  

What if he wants to "lead others off the reservation," so to speak?  We don't want UI (PK) to suddenly to become overly aware about the needs of other people. He may blink and want to really help them. Consequently, we might have to politely water board him and then covertly, in best practices fashion, blame it on the military.

Difficulty with Reconditioning

Recognizing that reconditioning is more difficult to achieve than initial conditioning, we are still prepared to act:  We cannot fail in our mission.  Klugman must be either  changed or eliminated through attrition, before he is completely outed. Additionally, it is recommended that he is mercifully referred to a self-destruct group, because we do not believe in violence.

Expected  Outcomes:  Krugman's success will lead to a strong mass desire for agenda-driven, cleverly written,  hate crimes law.  As an added bonus, PK will demonstrate ten ways to  cause the population to willingly ingest sugar-free red herrings. 

Conditioning Methods: Reward and Punishment

- To insure a socially appropriate, nihilistic,  conditioned response, UI PK will be manually massaged (wink, wink) and fed candy during the modernist,  politically correct video.

- To insure a conditioned gag response, UI  PK will be force-fed broccoli during the traditionalist's unwarranted,  hostile presentation on Communism.

PK's  leadership goals are as follows:

Goal1: successfully mislead Conservatives;

Goal2: establish a friendly relationship with conservatives;
Goal3: overcome doubt with lies;
Goal4: establish UI PK in the field of education as a moderate;
Goal5: deceive,  confuse, and destroy all true Christians;
Goal6: bring down the government of the United States of America;
Goal7: popularize "God is Dead" signs.

In closing, the Red Prince sends his eternal love with incivility, good wishes, and extends a polite demand to visit him soon at Anarchy St. (look down as you approach its gates).  As a reward, the Father of all Lies, will put in a good word for Krugman.

Signed,
True Believer UI, #200,000,000
USA's Communist Party,
Anarchists International,
Nihilists for the End of World

 

Sarah Rises to the Challenge

Sarah Palin: "America's Enduring Strength" from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.

Paul Krugman Mines American Psyches Looking for Soft Spots: Tea Party Patriots Targeted

IN MY VIEW

By Clotilde Frazier (c) January 9, 2011

Congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords,  first Jewish representative in the State of Arizona was shot, and is reportedly in critical condition. A Chief Judge, John Roll, a Christian, was killed, a nine-year old girl was killed, along with four others.  Reportedly, seventeen others were shot. 

Do you see a pattern here?  No? Having this much information, you can't say much you say?  Spot on! But Paul Krugman of the NY Times, professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University, wants his own piece of this crisis in the making. I say making, because Paul Krugman, "liberal with a conscience," is joining in the distortion fray: "[Don't] have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was." All of life is one big political game.  So what's his point?  It's Sarah Palin and the Tea-Party. 
 
Odd, don't you think? that Krugman does not  mention there were six deaths in his opening lines. Instead, Krugman predictably focuses on the fact that Giffords was a Democrat, suggesting it is  open season on Democrats.

Logic warning: a Democrat was shot in a botched assassination attempt. Proposition:  it must be Sarah Palin and the Tea-Party who are the cause of all the carnage; therefore, whenever and wherever you have a fact-based,  self-educated, self-motivated, and self-controlled electorate, you can expect murder and mayhem to arise.

It's high time, Krugman says, for the GOP leaders to "take a stand against the hate-mongers." Who are the (hate) mongers?   Inferential/suggestion, grey-matter, and  insidious-mush warning: Forget the mongers part and focus on the hate part. The Krugman's of the world are dying to extend the reach of their vile hate laws. Flawed inferences and veiled suggestion will do for the sixth-grade blog readers among us.  People are too busy to read between the lines, he thinks.   
 
A lefty Johnny Appleseed, Krugman is sowing discord.  It is not logic or facts he is hawking; it is pure propaganda swill. His intent?  We can only surmise based on his attempts to lay blame: Would it be silly to assume he wants his associates to gain the offensive and take Republicans and the Tea-Party off-track for a long while?

Lefties are poisoning the collaborative well. Taint the Tea-Party name, kill the voices that powerfully disseminate information, divide the Republican party, then watch as Republicans and Independents are demoralized, distracted, and lose focus.  Take away Internet rights by fiat, corrupt the election process, as Lisa Murkowski did,  and you have won an election.

The Left wants and tactically needs the offensive, because our radical President Obama and the Socialist Left can't stand up to scrutiny, especially when the electorate is doing their homework. Obama and his crew are essentially born tacticians.  To beat them Republicans will have to mine their ranks and place their own tacticians in key positions.

No guess work is required to determine what the media (Krugman et al) will do. They have begun attempts to weaken the Republicans.  The press will be obsessively throwing distracting time-bombs at Republicans, allowing faux members to speak for the party.  Lisa Murkowski for one has demonstrated her animus. 

After her loss in the Alaska Republican Primary, Lisa demonstrated that she would and could take part in an effort to render null the Tea-Party Movement, along with Sarah Palin and anyone else that got in her way. She is the poster child for the phrase: "by hook or by crook."

There are a lot of bruised Republicans and Democrats who taste blood when they think of Tea-Party's efforts in the last election. Krugman isn't alone.  Other's drink from the same poisoned well.

As political types wax  irresponsible about the "dangerous" Tea-Party movement's affect on American politics, someone needs to hold up the left's Dorian Grey portrait. You can't get much lower than using a person's tragedy to make political points. No longer attractive, the left is just plain low-down ugly and criminal. In truth, they lie. Their disrespect for fact-based reasoning, and those who exercise it, is devoid of integrity or sympathy.

 Jan 8, 2011 a mind-sotted 22 year-old man shot, killed and injured innocents, politicians, and anyone else who got in his way.  Two of his favorite books reportedly dealt with socialism's extremes: terrorism within Mein Kampf, The Communist Manifesto and so on. 

Odd, don't you think, that Krugman failed to address Jared Lee Loughner's unstable predispositions?  Who is really to blame for the 22 year-old's  sick views?  Let's start with Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler, to name a few. All were once effective grass-roots socialist-organizers who became tactical political murderers and criminal sociopaths.

Beware when community organizers and media with a god complex claim that they have an offended "Liberal conscience."  This unfettered, faithful and faithfilled Roman Catholic's knees bend only at God's altar. 

Vandals at the Gates

The rule-breakers have gone too far in Alaska’s recent elections. The subsequent outrage is palatable and will grow as my fellow Americans discover the depths to which the Murkowski crew has sunk. They have declared war and I am responding. My children and their children require no less.

These past days, I have watched Alaska’s Senator Lisa Murkowski’s despicable and unwarranted attacks on former governor, Sarah Palin. Evidently these two women have a history. It appears that attacks on Palin are diversionary tactics: they serve as cover-ups for voter ballot criminality and other malfeasance taking place behind the scenes.

Senator Lisa Murkowski has treated Alaska’s Republican Primary voters as enemies. Take a look at ciminality and what passes for a voter’s ballots in the State of Alaska.

Here

Who are the people that wanted Senator Murkowski to override the election process? I can’t say. But someone needs to conduct a forensic audit to discover who changed (stole) votes. Whose handwriting was repetitively used on many ballots?

Not to be out done by Internationalists’ scorched earth tactics, Lisa Murkowski has shown that she will eagerly go along with corruptible surrogates to achieve her fraudulent UN-American ends.

Is it possible that Lisa, a sell-out Republican, who had a noble platform to guide her, but rejected it, would think that her transgressions against the rule of the law and the people would be forgiven? Why wouldn’t she? She has succeeded and we easily forget. But, will we this time?

Dissatisfied with her alliance’s undoing of loyal Republican voters, Lisa went on to execute a scorched earth policy as she was [assigned]? to look for real or imagined enemies, and became the leftist media’s useful darling.

The media's Katie Couric et al, could not lure Sarah Palin into daffy, snippy, braggadocio, exhibited by Murkowski. Couric did all that she could to contain herself as Lisa snootily chatted on about a contrived, out-of-context diversion, ala Sarah Palin.  Here

As yet, Joe Miller had not yet said that he was requesting a recount based on evidence. The nation had turned its short attention span to matters associated with airport security's inappropriate touching and Sarah Palin. Soros must have been ecstatic.

Tonight, I wonder if our leaders are stable and competent, and can be trusted to make sound decisions for modern Alaska in the face of impending disasters, dire distractions, saber rattling with Russia and China, and a powerful native population which aligns itself with the UN.

We in Alaska are about to be tested. The test is this: enemies and their allies continue to create distractions with the intent to undo the will of the people. They did it to Sarah Palin. Joe Miller is the latest fatality of Alaska’s rough ‘n’ tumble, anti-social politics.

Looking for our weaknesses, our enemies found them with Murkowski's help, and they proceeded to undo the dream of "One," Our Senator has cynically engaged in the divisive process of terminally dividing the people along the lines of Ancients vs. Newcomers.

Are we strong, wise, competent, stable and generous enough to avoid a collision with the massive socialist/communist ship-of-state? I believe we are in trouble. Senator Murkowski hasn't protected us from a possible Collision; she is insuring one. Consequently, Joe, with his contextually driven judgment-calls, appears to be the more malleable of the two. By using her power against the Republican Primary, Lisa's flaws outweigh his.

The discord Lisa Murkowski sows is personal. It is MY vote that she and others are attempting to steal through a process of power, wealth, hurdles, and negation. In effect, her actions contravene my civil rights while she uses her immense influence with native Alaskans to diminish my effect. Shame!

- I believe that PACs and Lisa Murkowski, with the help of useful bureaucrats, acted with malice-of-forethought, to effectuate unfair outcomes in the Republican Party's Primary Election, thereby creating hurdles that effectually deny me important rights.

- Murkowski et al., have, de facto, destroyed established institutional voting practices, and, in so doing, they function unfairly as empowered bullies, who have caused the diminishment and effectiveness of my statutory voting franchise, which was achieved through a lawful legislative process.

- I am helpless to effectively fight for my established franchise and suffrage, and fear that my full citizen-rights are jeopardized and may be lost.

- I am not the sole target in this despicable process. Even if Senator Murkowski loses her race, she has significantly and capriciously harmed my potential voice, my candidate, Joe Miller.

- I believe that Senator Murkowski means to deny Mr. Joe Miller a mandate, and by extension she obstructs my influence on the legislative process. Her actions plead "Outlaw-wise," and are expressions of the same raw power currently exercised by President Barack Obama.

- Senator Murkowski works de facto to deny the nation at large an effective governing voice, and in so doing, she destroys a specific trust between herself and ”We the people," - that is - the duty of fair representation.

Comments:

Unless reasonable people act long-term to counter the Murkowski/Soros/(Social) Democrat's march to insurrection, History will record that we will have been the first State in the Union to allow entrenched socialist bureaucrats to willfully obstruct and negate the will of the Alaskan people, and by extension, the whole of the American nation. We are the sum of our parts.

How does she do it? She uses willing accomplices, including wealthy protected (corporate) “minorities: against other Alaskans.

Senator Murkowski demonstrably has broken a trust agreement with the Republican Party and me, per se, and has shown that she will cynically do so into the future.

Note: Under my given name, I voted for Senator Lisa Murkowski in previous Primary and general state elections. I voted for her father, Senator Frank Murkowski, and I did not contribute to Joe Miller's campaign. I did support Miller this time around because he appeared to be in support of the Republican party's platform. Lisa has turned too far left.

Having witnessed events as they unfolded, I will contribute to his legal fund.  It is the least that I can now do in defense of Joe Miller, and my voting rights as was intended under the Voting Rights Act.  Here  The state can in no way abridge my rights through fraud and or manipulation. It clearly appears that they have acted inappropriately, if not criminally.



SARAH PALIN'S TERMINAL DECISION TO BACK JOHN MCCAIN: TWICE SHAME ON YOU

This time, I don't have to hold my nose - I have a choice

Wanted!

This Propagandist for Abuse of The Sacrificial Lamb

To Sarah Palin:

Now you went and did it! You are backing [groan] McCain in this election cycle? Are you crazy? You know of course that you potentially can divide a grassroots movement that is just beginning to have a sense of itself. Your endorsement symbolically has given the good people of Arizona a proposition that they absolutely have to refuse.

As a traditional person who happens to be a true Catholic, I have seen my rights restricted by no-see-um do-gooders, who are following the rest of the dumb sheep over the cliff, as the wolves pursue them to their death.

I will follow the Lamb of God Who did not come to change the law - God's Law.

If it was good enough for the Son of God - well, need I say more?

I nominate Mrs. McCain "Dumb sheep of the month," with you in second place. Moreover, I am taping over the ''Go Sarah" message on my hooded, pullover sweatshirt.

So, you're backing McCain of the McCain/Feingold debacle. His wife just proved that she is a child who can be led by a pack of one-world-order wolves, who hate women. WHY did you do this?  I contributed to your pac and defended you: no more.

I suggest that you, J. McCain and Cindy McCain purchase the book, The Pink Swastika, and read it for comprehension. If the information in that book doesn't stand your hair on end I don't know what will.

M-A-R-R-I-A-G-E is between one man and one woman. Got it Cindy? Got it Sarah? Got it Senator McCain? 

Sarah, "rogue" is not good and is not to be confused with courage and wisdom.  I wish you both, but now, I think your are just too full of yourself, like the lefties who are relishing your bad judment.

Signed: an irate Alaskan who will send money to conservative candidates who have been appropriately vetted.