Sunday, January 9, 2011

Paul Krugman Mines American Psyches Looking for Soft Spots: Tea Party Patriots Targeted


By Clotilde Frazier (c) January 9, 2011

Congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords,  first Jewish representative in the State of Arizona was shot, and is reportedly in critical condition. A Chief Judge, John Roll, a Christian, was killed, a nine-year old girl was killed, along with four others.  Reportedly, seventeen others were shot. 

Do you see a pattern here?  No? Having this much information, you can't say much you say?  Spot on! But Paul Krugman of the NY Times, professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University, wants his own piece of this crisis in the making. I say making, because Paul Krugman, "liberal with a conscience," is joining in the distortion fray: "[Don't] have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was." All of life is one big political game.  So what's his point?  It's Sarah Palin and the Tea-Party. 
Odd, don't you think? that Krugman does not  mention there were six deaths in his opening lines. Instead, Krugman predictably focuses on the fact that Giffords was a Democrat, suggesting it is  open season on Democrats.

Logic warning: a Democrat was shot in a botched assassination attempt. Proposition:  it must be Sarah Palin and the Tea-Party who are the cause of all the carnage; therefore, whenever and wherever you have a fact-based,  self-educated, self-motivated, and self-controlled electorate, you can expect murder and mayhem to arise.

It's high time, Krugman says, for the GOP leaders to "take a stand against the hate-mongers." Who are the (hate) mongers?   Inferential/suggestion, grey-matter, and  insidious-mush warning: Forget the mongers part and focus on the hate part. The Krugman's of the world are dying to extend the reach of their vile hate laws. Flawed inferences and veiled suggestion will do for the sixth-grade blog readers among us.  People are too busy to read between the lines, he thinks.   
A lefty Johnny Appleseed, Krugman is sowing discord.  It is not logic or facts he is hawking; it is pure propaganda swill. His intent?  We can only surmise based on his attempts to lay blame: Would it be silly to assume he wants his associates to gain the offensive and take Republicans and the Tea-Party off-track for a long while?

Lefties are poisoning the collaborative well. Taint the Tea-Party name, kill the voices that powerfully disseminate information, divide the Republican party, then watch as Republicans and Independents are demoralized, distracted, and lose focus.  Take away Internet rights by fiat, corrupt the election process, as Lisa Murkowski did,  and you have won an election.

The Left wants and tactically needs the offensive, because our radical President Obama and the Socialist Left can't stand up to scrutiny, especially when the electorate is doing their homework. Obama and his crew are essentially born tacticians.  To beat them Republicans will have to mine their ranks and place their own tacticians in key positions.

No guess work is required to determine what the media (Krugman et al) will do. They have begun attempts to weaken the Republicans.  The press will be obsessively throwing distracting time-bombs at Republicans, allowing faux members to speak for the party.  Lisa Murkowski for one has demonstrated her animus. 

After her loss in the Alaska Republican Primary, Lisa demonstrated that she would and could take part in an effort to render null the Tea-Party Movement, along with Sarah Palin and anyone else that got in her way. She is the poster child for the phrase: "by hook or by crook."

There are a lot of bruised Republicans and Democrats who taste blood when they think of Tea-Party's efforts in the last election. Krugman isn't alone.  Other's drink from the same poisoned well.

As political types wax  irresponsible about the "dangerous" Tea-Party movement's affect on American politics, someone needs to hold up the left's Dorian Grey portrait. You can't get much lower than using a person's tragedy to make political points. No longer attractive, the left is just plain low-down ugly and criminal. In truth, they lie. Their disrespect for fact-based reasoning, and those who exercise it, is devoid of integrity or sympathy.

 Jan 8, 2011 a mind-sotted 22 year-old man shot, killed and injured innocents, politicians, and anyone else who got in his way.  Two of his favorite books reportedly dealt with socialism's extremes: terrorism within Mein Kampf, The Communist Manifesto and so on. 

Odd, don't you think, that Krugman failed to address Jared Lee Loughner's unstable predispositions?  Who is really to blame for the 22 year-old's  sick views?  Let's start with Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler, to name a few. All were once effective grass-roots socialist-organizers who became tactical political murderers and criminal sociopaths.
Beware when community organizers and media with a god complex claim that they have an offended "Liberal conscience."  This unfettered, faithful and faithfilled Roman Catholic's knees bend only at God's altar. 


  1. Bravo! Your analysis is absolutely correct.