Useful Idiots Demand Publication of UI Krugman's Personality Profile

 Clotilde Frazier (c) January 11, 2011 - revised 1-27-2011

UI Krugman's Personality: A Report to the Comrades

From A  domestic communist cell: new conditioning goals based on UI Krugman's (quantified) personality chart.

Greetings Comrades: We have worked out past kinks involving the historical Masonic One-World-Order and were thrilled with the music that accompanied our farewells.

Unfortunately, UI (Useful Idiot)  Paul Krugman has been outed. His outing has served to spoil our one-hundred percent, nondiscriminatory, hug-hug, civil meeting, making other UIs one-hundred percent hopping mad and uncivil.  

We must find a way to scrutinize Comrade Krugman for personality deficiencies. To this end, we have quantified UI Krugman's personality for illegal profiling purposes in the event that we need to dispose, I mean, elim..., I mean discard unwanted traits. We have a final solution in place, if needs arise.  

Background:

We are concerned that Comrade Krugman, et al., has caused an alarm bell to sound among American Conservatives, some of whom are  senior citizens. We must change our conditioning strategies as we sift for personality weaknesses.

Problem 1:  The Tea-Party's older fools are speaking out about their health care needs and costs.  Usually silent, they are telling the nation exactly how much our splendid Ponzi-like Medicare scheme really costs them. 

Problem 2: The  seniors and Conservatives  are not cowed by our Committee's efforts to blame them and Sarah Palin for the recent murders and mayhem in Arizona. In fact, our UI,  Paul Krugman, et al has been partially exposed as an UI by bright bloggers and talk show hosts.  It doesn't end there.

Problem 3:  Our formerly quiet radical neocon friends failed to successfully moderate the rising conservative tide. 

Problem 4:  While Krugman's thinking and personality are skillful and representative of best mole practices in Communist thinking, his occasional lack of objectivity places him at risk when he's confronted by objective thinkers in the conservative movement.

Problem 5: UI (PK) is unable to insert himself at will within groups of unsuspecting conservatives to a degree that would allow them to trust him.

Problem 6:  the Committee for UI (Useful Idiot) Control (CUIC) studied Comrade Krugman's commentaries, and has detected covert, uncivil willfulness in his personality structures. 

There is also a desirable one-sided propensity, which  leads to above-average  subjectivity.  Put another way, he sees life on his terms sixty-percent of the time, often making him useful and corruptible.  Conversely, forty-percent of the time he may be curious about others, allowing in some human concerns. We must apply conditioning strategies to extinguish him, I mean these tendencies.  Details about profiling techniques are not allowed for the purposes of this report.  The author's original intent was to empower individuals.  Of course, we found a way around her intents.  

Comments: Normally UI PL's predispositions  are good Communist characteristics, but with the rise of Christian, spiritually-driven Conservatism, PK has to improve think-out-of-the-box strategies that are at once civil,  conversely evil, and full lies.   

By coming out of the shadows, he has drawn the ire of many "civil" Americans, who must again in mass be painted as "uncivil." We can only hope that they will not form more consciences as we regroup.

Klugman's Personality's Theoretical Characteristics:

Self vs. Me" Ratios

Looking at his primary mode of functionality, UI (PK) can be expected at any  time to demonstrate a below the median "self" or "me" frame of reference. He draws from these levels at least sixty-three percent of the time.

This means his personality is commendably narcissistic for UIs.  Our hope is to teach him to ignore secondary drives which cause him to consider "Others." These mixed 6:4 types give us a headache. Reconditioning as you know is difficult. Nonetheless we must force, I mean, urge UI PK to go along in order to get along.

Extinguishing "Others" or larger world views in UI Krugman's mission modes is a problematic situation: on the surface, UI's must appear Christian or Christian-like, yet actually be narcissistically destructive  at least ninety-percent of the time.   

Since UI Krugman allowed himself to be exposed, we must consider how to manipulate other personality drives; wherein, he is functioning in the "other"

modes,  wherein he is curious about others, as well as their thoughts and needs.  

Overt vs Covert Behavioral Modes

Our concern with UI (PK) Krugman is that  while he primarily has  a one-hundred percent  inclination to function in the shadows (covertly), that drive may at times be diminished to forty-percent by secondary (overall) drives.  During these times, he may blink or change, move to a sincere status, and/or  care too much and blow his cover.  It is our job to repress these inclinations.

To the point, UI (PK) can function in the self mode at least six out of ten times but we may be able to train him in a Pavlovian manner to reinforce stronger "self" frames of reference. As we consider reeducation, it is prudent to remember that we don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.  Finding one-hundred percent primary "coverts" who are "self" focused is time consuming because we don't have a complete data base.

Leader, Organizer, Communicator Drives

UI, Paul Krugman is essentially a Leader. Communication drives are used to that end. This will essentially propel him to be a  true believer in the marriage of Utilitarianism and  Pragmatism.  If lying works, use it, in all contexts.  

What if he wants to "lead others off the reservation," so to speak?  We don't want UI (PK) to suddenly to become overly aware about the needs of other people. He may blink and want to really help them. Consequently, we might have to politely water board him and then covertly, in best practices fashion, blame it on the military.

Difficulty with Reconditioning

Recognizing that reconditioning is more difficult to achieve than initial conditioning, we are still prepared to act:  We cannot fail in our mission.  Klugman must be either  changed or eliminated through attrition, before he is completely outed. Additionally, it is recommended that he is mercifully referred to a self-destruct group, because we do not believe in violence.

Expected  Outcomes:  Krugman's success will lead to a strong mass desire for agenda-driven, cleverly written,  hate crimes law.  As an added bonus, PK will demonstrate ten ways to  cause the population to willingly ingest sugar-free red herrings. 

Conditioning Methods: Reward and Punishment

- To insure a socially appropriate, nihilistic,  conditioned response, UI PK will be manually massaged (wink, wink) and fed candy during the modernist,  politically correct video.

- To insure a conditioned gag response, UI  PK will be force-fed broccoli during the traditionalist's unwarranted,  hostile presentation on Communism.

PK's  leadership goals are as follows:

Goal1: successfully mislead Conservatives;

Goal2: establish a friendly relationship with conservatives;
Goal3: overcome doubt with lies;
Goal4: establish UI PK in the field of education as a moderate;
Goal5: deceive,  confuse, and destroy all true Christians;
Goal6: bring down the government of the United States of America;
Goal7: popularize "God is Dead" signs.

In closing, the Red Prince sends his eternal love with incivility, good wishes, and extends a polite demand to visit him soon at Anarchy St. (look down as you approach its gates).  As a reward, the Father of all Lies, will put in a good word for Krugman.

Signed,
True Believer UI, #200,000,000
USA's Communist Party,
Anarchists International,
Nihilists for the End of World

 

Polish President and Important Hierarchy Lost to Poland In Air Crash of Questionable Cause

Katyn Revisited part one

By Clotilde Frazier all rights reserved

The Third Republic of Poland has been dealt a mortal blow.  Its president has been killed and its vital leaders from the military to finance are lost to that woeful country. Under the leadership of President Lech Kaczyinski, Poland was our loyal ally, and although we don't know it yet, we, too, have been dealt a mortal blow. Few spilled their blood with our troops.  The hopeful Poles did. It is unlikely that we will see help like this again.   

Under the cynical leadership of President Barack H. Obama, Poland was abandoned by our country. Obama's deceit was and remains shameful. The people of the United States mourn for the people of Poland and their proud President. 

A Pro Russian View of Kaczyinski 

Let us leave Poland's loss and appropriately focus on the question of why President Kaczyinski and important personages were headed to Russia.  The simple answer is: they were determined to memorialize the Russian NKVD 's clandestine massacre of twenty-two thousand Polish officers in the Katyn forest, near Smolensk, Russia.  

There is a strong sense that the death of Kaczyinski and his important entourage is a matter of History repeating itself.  Given the facts, heavenly justice requires that the world at large return to Katyn, where souls were lost. The world must remove the cause of Katyn's festering, hidden wound.

Emboldened  by the Obama presidency, the Russians have been doing their utmost to intimidate the Poles.  The unfortunate turn of events was most strongly felt when they held war games in the region. Kaczyinski appeard unphased and seemed to hold to his anti Neo-Soviet views, despite President Obama's abandonment.

With Kaczyinski's death, the ghost of Katyn seems to have now reappeared  as a warning to the West. As with the first Katyn forest murders in 1940, the Neo-Soviets suspiciously look again like  murderous  perpetrators, who are  [again] intent on denying Poland its most gifted citizens. 

One wonders how the Katyn 2010 story will be spun.  Our communist inspired, useful and capitulating president need not worry about a similar fate since he is one of them. Here.

Do we care about the lessons of Katyn? Any one watching Russia's moves around the world as they arm enemies of the USA, cannot help but view their acts as hostile. They have a history of manipulating useful idiots in various countries to attack us. It wasn't Russian  NKVD/KGB blood that was shed in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, etc. Their Cuban minions controlled Africa, South America etc.  Their Chinese allies fought us in Korea and Vietnam. 

Adroit, cowardly, stealthy killers, Russia's NKVD/ KGB leadership's  Modus operandi appears unchanged.  As with the first Katyn outrage, history will preside over the cause of yesterday's massacre.The coming convoluted  post mortem will no doubt in time pinpoint the real perpertrators. In the mean time the world will be fed red herrings.  

During World War II the Soviet NKVD assassinated Polish prisoners in Katyn Forest. They were the best of  Poland's officer corps.  Their skills would have been used to restore Poland to a leadership position after the defeat of Germany.

The Russian (sic) communist leadership could ill-afford a well prepared Christian rival on its border. Having destroyed the Russian people,  communists were poised, with the help of Western industrialists, to spread atheism's  domination and godless  theory throughout the world. 

During the wind-up of WWII, General G. Patton pleaded with General Dwight D. Eisenhower to let him fight on to defeat the communist threat.  Patton was punished for the thought. The communists had penetrated our own government and industrial centers of power.

"I do not believe in communism any more than you do but there is nothing wrong with the Communists in this country; several of the best friends I have got are Communists."  Roosevelt, Franklin D.

 Source: President FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, conversation with Representative Martin Dies at the White House, as reported by Dies.Congressional Record, September 22, 1950, vol. 96, Appendix, p. A6832.  - Source

Addressing the WWII Katyn forest massacre in Smolensk, and alluding to a similarity,  former president Aleksander Kwaśniewski told TVN24 that “It is a cursed place. It sends shivers down my spine. First the flower of the Second Polish Republic is murdered in the forests around Smolensk, now the intellectual elite of the Third Polish Republic die in this tragic plane crash when approaching Smolensk airport.”  Spot on.  The Neo-Soviet's want a weakened, faux Catholic Poland. 

Katyn? Why should we care?  Look at our troops in Afghanistan.  That important airfield in Tajikistan has long been manipulated into the Neo-Soviet camp.  "In February 2009, president Rahmonov announced that he would allow [only] nonmilitary supplies bound to support the NATO effort in Afghanistan to transit through his country. Alternate supply routes were needed in light of neighboring Kyrgyzstan's announcement that it would shut down a major U.S. support facility--Manas air base."  Emphasis mine - globalsecurity.org

The old Soviet model didn't die, it merely "changed." Long ago and far away the Russian's have been dominant in the region with, guess who? [Iran], as their partner. Source: Inter Press Service English News Wire

02-25-1997

Analysis by Dilip Hiro

LONDON, Feb. 24 (IPS) -- The weekend pact signed between the Tajik government and its Islamist opposition shows the deepening friendship between Iran and Russia that has developed since the break-up of the Soviet Union in late 1991. By the same token it means a setback to Washington's policy of isolating Teheran and, not the least, it effectively signifies an end to the near five-year-old civil war in Tajikistan thanks to Russian and [Iranian] cooperation. Emphasis mine. And you want to believe that Iran is operating alone?

Think of 200,000 American troops being caught in a spiders web... and maybe you will figure it out. They, like the WWII Polish Officers, are a vital well-trained link to our survival.  The point was made in the Movie Katyn that you can build tanks, but you cannot replace a well trained soldier.  The Poles found that out. Are we about to repeat history in Afghanistan? Maybe!Pray for our troops, for communist Dominion was predicted at Fatima.  

Watch the movie, Katyn,  for an understanding of the history that changed and enslaved the world. The first four parts are presented in this blog as an invitation, so that you will have eyes to see and ears to hear.  This excellent movie is fully available on Utube.  Buy the DVD if you can. Cyclical  History is repeating itself.  While you are at it, true Catholics,  take out your rosaries and pray.

Katyn Pt one

Katyn pt two

Katyn pt three

Katyn pt four

BURNED NEWSPAPER ARTICLE THAT NEVER WAS: A TRUE STORY part eight Copyright 2009

Dear MGMers,

Your grandmother had many teachers as she grew.  Some taught her profound things like, Jerome, the radicalized young black man who offered information. He would have been surpised to know that as they talked she was putting a mental puzzle together.
  

  ***

Jerome was the President of the campus Afro-American group.  He was working the system, but he was unflinchingly direct about it, and SL was at ease with directness; however, her internal alarm button was set on "go," allowing for a quick retreat in the event that her respect was misplaced.

SL played the role of a listener. Jerome had no idea that she had confronted a radical brother before Dr. King hit the streets in Selma, or that she was terrorized by night-callers who growled, “Nigger lover.” He had no way of knowing that she was for the rights of all individuals, including her own.

SL's belief in human rights, as opposed to racial or gender rights, divided the two. Jerome had not yet demonstrated an interest in a similar universal ethic. He was, in SL’s estimation, necessarily focused on his own need for civil-rights. A universal, humanitarian ethic would come - she believed and hoped - in time, “perhaps a hundred years from now when generations have passed.”

The two played an informational exchange game. SL was careful not to give up too much information. Jerome liked to talk, even brag.  She listened patiently, hoping to uncover the real reason behind his calls. The pay-off for her patience came one evening when Jerome laughingly confided that Afro leadership had been offered full scholarships if they would “radicalize.”

Annoyed and alerted, SL inquired, “Who would want you to become radicals?” “A priest,” he replied, totally oblivious to his disclosure's effect. 

For a second, words evaporated into a black hole. Silence replaced communication.  SL was momentarily stunned. The answer to a perplexing question that had troubled her for several years had just been dumped into her memory's trap door. She hadn't sought specific information, yet, here it was. She needed a second to recoup and did, among, uh huhs, hmms etc. Her memory's door opened and there he was: the radical's radical.

SL worked for a time as a human relations representative for her local parish church. She was encouraged to attend training workshops, the purpose of which was to "educate" her on the grueling experiences of black Americans.

SL had successfully organized a community forum to discuss the needs of minority blacks, and participated in the formation of her home town's first human relations council.  She hoped to help make a difference and a better world.  But, she had not anticipated that she would be tested by a noxious revolutionary.

Initially, the workshop leaders, under the guidance of Detroit's Archbishop D., were restrained and helpful, however, a new speaker appeared. He threatened the group with in-your-face diatribes. Angry at the man's obvious ignorance about the prices she paid to be there, SL walked up to him during a break and whispered that he was a SOB and left, never to look back on her church's civil-rights activism again. Her own vision of human relations evaded gender and racial specificity in the future.

What had the revolutionary said that angered her? "We are armed," the radical had shouted at the white audience, then hurled the final insult: "You aren't here because you care: you are scared." Those words still echo in her memory.  SL knew in her soul that this was a bonified communist I'll-kill-you if-I-can, bully. The perplexing question was how did her fellow Catholics get mixed up with communists of any kind?

The question lurked in the back of her mind. However, SL would have to wait for another time when another black man misspoke. Her suspicion that communists had infiltrated her beloved church was a lonely cross that she would carry for many years.

“Are you sure that he is a priest, Jerome?” “Yeh!” “What is his name?” Jerome hesitated then named his benefactor.  She didn't recognize the Irish surname, but would check it out, later.  She deduced with ample angst that if the bandit priest was offering scholarships, he must be working in  Detroit's Archdiocesan offices.

Recovering shattered calm, SL’s angst was momentarily aimed at Jerome’s indifference. “Why would you bargain with the devil, rather than try to climb the ladder on your own?

SL realized that she was accusing him of wanting to take the easy way out. Jerome responded quickly to the challenge and asked her, “Would you refuse the goose who laid a golden egg?” She responded that she would refuse, but realized the assertion was based on faith. She wondered if Jerome ever knew faith's blessings as she did.

SL was not overcome by the kind of rage and hate that consumes souls. She understood the source of Jerome’s animus, but was completely at a loss to explain the priest’s soulless offer.  Then, she recalled Nikita Khrushchev’s brag to bury America, without a shot being fired. She realized that the Russian's comments weren’t founded in bombastic braggadocio, but stemmed from a cruel plan that had been implemented in the totalitarian past, reaching down into the sixties with Vietnam. Could they have put faux priests in place? The intriguing question was answered in the affimative, years later.

SL riled at the thought that several years earlier she herself may have been identified as a useful pawn in the early days of Vatican II, when powerful moles and radicals within the church hierarchy handily adopted liberation theology and, under the cover of church unity, agreed through the Moscow-Vatican Agreement to cease all criticism of communism.

http://www.catholictradition.org/Mary/fatima5.htm

SL hypothesized  that moles vandalized  by finding weak links in America and elsewhere, and coalesced with  radicals in America to effect social change.

The mighty Catholic Church had to be auto-demolished or destroyed from within, while preserving a Catholic exterior.  The new church would be friendly to a socialist one world order. Working like a mycoplasma bacterium, communists worked the useful parts of her remnants to serve communist revolutionaries everywhere.  Jerome and SL had their small parts to play. She resisted. He welcomed the moles as manna to feed his opportunism.

SL would cross racial barriers and worked to establish understanding and mutual responsibility, but she could not accept communism or radicalism as a cure for economic and racial injustice, only God’s grace could accomplish such a fete.

In SL's mind, church and state had ironically fused, resulting in a  cruel auto-demolition. Only twisted parts of each remained to serve coming generations that were sensitized to welcome socialism as their religion of choice.

In a shift of fate, a young black radical-to-be unknowingly helped SL put the pieces of a complex puzzle together, with a late night phone call.  He would call again, but it would be the last time the two would speak.

To be continued

TIBETAN BRUTALITY BY CHINA:WHY DO WE CARE?

SO, OBAMA, YOU WANT TO THINK AND REFLECT: REFLECT ON THIS

What do we tell our children when asked about man's inhumanity? 

Put a different face on the perpetrators in this video: pick your own perceived evil perpetrator. Then look in the mirror. We all have the potential to be inhumane.

The French revolutionary idealists, through their rhetoric, tried to paint a positive (neutral) picture of humankind: man (woman) was essentially a blank book, neither good or evil. Their view of humankind was wrong in every sense.

We are as much Cain's brothers and sisters as Abel's, and bear the stain of original sin.  We are family members of perpetrator-victims.  Look inward, America, for too long brother Cain has held sway over our passions. We must change for the better.

No government or political figure can bring us to the required turning point that directs our path back to the Triune God.

 It took Christ's sacrificial death and His New Testament to tell us there was another way.  It took the Bill of Rights and a Constitution to give us a road map and the rules of the road. 

So, why are you destroying the successful marriage of the two, Obama, in the name of the false unity of a one world Communist/Socialist lie? 

DENNIS PRAGER MISLEADS

NEXT

       

       RADIO HOST TALKS LISTENERS INTO A FAIRNESS TRAP AS CONDITIONED,       

       CHILDREN'S ARMIES ARE BORN AGAIN

Note: this post was made earlier and was lost and found. Here it is again.

Dear Mr. Prager:

It is important to think for ourselves. Tuesday, you said it was unfair to judge President Obama before listening to his address (words) to the children of the U.S. You called for fairness, implying that your contemporaries were unfair because they wanted to stop a revolutionary President from a take-over of the public school system. Fairness: is that akin to tolerance?

Bishop Sheehan once said that "Americans have grown so tolerant that they tolerate evil." One never knows with you. Your pressure-cooked insistence that we Americans should stupidly allow our Marxist-loving president to address the Nation's ill-informed students is troublesome and presents me with a get-in-your-face moment. Results loving, I am a: "Don't talk of love - show me," person.

Your defense of President Obama was more in keeping with a high school basketball coach and shows a significant insensitivity or indifference to our dangerous times. It would be understandable if you were ignorant, however, you are informed, maybe a little touched, but smartly so. 

Obama's  presentation before the Nation's (captive) students and their secular handlers, was intended to be an enlistment, brainwashing session. How do I know this?  I follow the facts and listen carefully to our President, especially since I see him as an adversary.

Just what do you want to hear from his lips?  He has demonstrated that he is in the process of taking over the country.  Again, how do I know this? He said he would, the signs are there, and I can still add. 

What do you think he meant when he said he would T-R-A-N-S-F-O-R-M the country?  What do you think he meant when he said he wanted to create a civilian army?  Are we to assume that the only "fair" thing to do is allow him to succeed? I love my children and grandchildren. I don't want them to have to face down paid bullies who will lead us to History's garbage bin.

 I had posted  a comparison picture of the Obama Brigades, hoping to cause you to think critically about this  President's Master Plan, and the darn thing disappeared.  I was ready to give up, but I remembered our troops were being blown-up like sitting ducks and said, "Self, you cannot be wimpy when they are dying and suffering."   

Speaking of the military: they have their lives before them, as do the children in our schools. I have a question: if revolutionary personalities frequently use children as future cannon fodder, why would you want to be "fair" and give a radical revolutionary like, President Obama, a national forum from which he can propagate  lies through folksy words?  Eveyone knows he is just a down-home-folks kind of nice guy. Right? If you believe that, or want to, you're not my kind of talk-show host.

It pains me to think about the useful who are making it possible for Obama to seed his lies, like a malevolent shade of Johnny Appleseed.  Youth are easy pickings and sometimes rapidly used up. Young armies, of the kind President Obama disclosed he desires, should be told that their desirability lies in the fact that they are easily formed, controlled and exterminated.

You are something of a Historian, Mr. Prager.  You know that  "Final Solutions" are created to deal with undesirables and used-up idiotic followers, all of whom find permanence in mass graves, firing squads, beheadings etc. Do you think that totalitarian leaning leaders know what "fair" is? Is this what you want for our youth?  Of course not; you are, after all, a "fair" man.  How do I know?  You say so, over and over again, and I am a good listener.

 It is down-right perplexing to me that you ignored the expose` prior to the day the President addressed the children.  You know, the one that disclosed el Presidente Obama had lesson plans aka (Core Curriculum) ready to impose on teachers and the kids, just like Fidel Castro's youthful Pioneers aka (future bullies). This old lady's blood pressure must have gone up by ten as you prattled on about being "fair."

I am not telling you anything that you do not know;therefore, it would have been appropriate if you have used the airwaves to shout out a warning, telling parents to empty the schools. Praise for a radical  in a white shirt, who smoothly propagates a false, benign image of  himself, is a little like eating "husks with the swine."

In light of all the fuss, what did Obama say to the students that was so important? Bottom-line: Work hard! You all have talent! The nation needs you! Who could find fault with that? Precisely the point! Who could find fault with those words? But then there were a few troublesome parts about that talk.

 Obama, the narcissist, must always embellish.  I wish he and his wife, Michele, would quit beating us over the head with attempts to prove he is one of us, as he continously campaigns on our dollar. Obama, one of the fallen: (hint at drug use), deserted son, single mother, food stamps, misspent youth, fallen youth, hard times, yawn, again created a false image of poverty, not to be construed with periods of stress that are encountered by most.

Standing before them resurrected, straight and upper-class, what youth would believe Obama to be a Marxist with designs on their souls? It isn't what the President said that was so threatening; it is what he didn't say that raises a cautionary flag. He has a Marxist history and a present (those rascal, nihilist, communist,czars), that should cause us to be alert 24/7.

Frankly, you are a disappointment, Mr. Prager. During your Tuesday talk show, a male caller unsuccessfully tried to pull you back from chasing windmills and indulging in self-reflections. The caller pointed out that children lack the knowledge to discern the difference between a man and his words. Well said (applaud, applaud).

You were morally undone by that comment but you seemed indifferent and inclined to stick to your verbal guns. By the way, I understand that there were brave picketers at the school where Obama spoke.  Their signs reportedly read: "Hands off our Children.   Right on fellow Americans.!  Don't eat husks with the swine, Mr. Prager, it is not good for soul or body.  

Sincerely,

A senior citizen and Nana
Self quiz Question: is the Obama Icon "merely advertising?" http://www.hellocuba.ca/castro_education.php