Alaska's Back Scratchers

In my view:

 By Clotilde Frazier (c) December 2010.  All rights reserved

Editors note:  This article was evolved from a long-term effort to develop a personality profile. Field tests suggest that it is a very useful theoretical forecasting tool.  Comments below were influenced by my findings.

Formerly brave 'n' bold, defanged independent Alaskans of old have largely faded away and have lost their voting rights franchise.  Predators didn't like the November election's outcomes and decided to change the rules (deconstruct the Republic).

Neighbors, friends and leaders appear to have been significantly out-strategized and replaced by Metro-tacticians who were transplanted from dark regions, where the bully's body politic rules in place of the "Power of One."  I am repulsed! 

Who ARE these bullies  who have absconded with my suffrage rights?  With only seventeen years residency, I feel more like a sourdough than the original, and that includes Lisa Murkowski.  Based on her conduct, she has identified herself as a back-scratching, spoiled  bully. Shame! 

Lisa's bullies, as I call them,  are the state of Alaska's elitist first generation spoiled brats. They reside in native villages and corporate offices, as well as established newcomer cities and towns. They believe that the world owes them a living and a certain level of empowerment.  Their reasoning? They were born in a certain place at a certain time in space. That's reason enough. 

They are often our national/ local politicians and bureaucrats.  They are legion and can charm or bully, depending on which side they awoke on any given day.  They are essentially an avaricious crowd of cowards and need to use each other to avoid detection.

They share a bully's level of moral development, which hinges on a cynical  value system of, "You scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours," and are  now known (for the fun of it) by the acronym: YS-MBA-ISY,  pronounced: (Yes'-maba-isy)  people.  It has an Obama inspired musical sense of rhythm to it.   

Unfortunately for mankind, many of us are predatorally compelled to  reside ensconed in the utilitarian level of moral reasoning. 

The back-scratchers live for "SELF," which makes them immoral and myopic troublemakers when they're are functioning from their dark side.

Unfortunately, they tend to hang with each other.  It makes sense. Who would scratch your back, they surmise, if not mutual user-predators and sellouts.  They can't trust power-of-one thinkers.

Math rules don't hold up with back-scratchers.   A negative times a negative doesn't yield a positive in a moral sense. They get along, but  time shows that mutual use wears thin, and becomes an itch in need of a scratch or rub-out; therefore, they need to blackmail each other, just to keep things from getting out of hand.

Speaking of users: the courts and, native corporation hacks have in effect told the rest of us that there is no room in their sandbox for the rest of us.  Why would we want to join them? Joe Miller tried to use logic, and we saw where that got him.  Those who ascribe to a Power-of-One philosophy, and voted in the primaries, in an effort to change the Alaskan sandbox's' "scratch" mentality, are enemies of the totalitarian state. Too bad we found  ourselves on the honest but losing side of the issue. God has His reasons.  

How badly are we affected by back-scratchers? Answer: immensely, even terminally.  Alaska's  recent November election has some aspects of a Greek Tragedy.  There is a difference though. Instead of the demise of a hero or heroine, the nation as a whole has been mortally wounded and even back-scratchers have been caught up in the post election mess. 

Amazingly, Lisa has the gall to tell Alaskans that we want her, while audaciously introducing a sense of the messianic to her troubled humanistic thought processes . Some might believe her, but I and thousands of others are appalled at her willingness to embrace leftist views, while expecting a similar brand of  dumb blindness  from us. In her faulty thinking, she is incompetent; In her unbridled rebelliousness, she is plain dangerous.

Lisa's  view  of party politics in the false name (red herring) of bipartisanship is irritating.  Does she really think we are blind to her subtrafuge? Her indifference to fraud in the election process is alarming, and we are not forgetting her unwillingness to accept honest Republican primary results. 

Who willingly corrupts Native power and an election, then declares her so-called "election" a "miracle?"  Answer: a troubled totalitarian underling who has sold her soul.  She has demonstrated that her need  for power is boundless and without conscience.  She is untrustworthy!What can be said of this election-injustice?  Clear-sighted individuals coming together to hopefully form a "[m]ore perfect union" have been unfortunately overcome by myopic types, like Murkowski, who endanger the election process' power-of-one. Her brand of bipartisanship is built on shifting sand. Not good!

Murkowski is badly mistaken. In the face of leftist dishonesty, we can't come together. Can oil mix with water? This is spiritual and political warfare. We form unions first as knowledgeable, moral individuals, not as useful idiots. Murkowski and her cohorts demand idiots. Moreover, politicians, and we the people, need santifying grace to make our way out of this mess.. Christ uttered the following warning not only to Peter, but to us for our time: Luke 22:31 "And the Lord said,  'Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: ...'"

How did we get to the equivalent of third world elections?  Answer: We blundered into Satan's sphere in the early sixties and beyond. As he was busily sifting, some welcomed him into their lives. Finding him comely and familiar, many trustingly greeted and embraced  the Sifter  as they would a familiar friend, with whom they shared many commonalities. In the continuum, many rebellious risk-takers, like Lisa Murkowski, refused God's version of rule-driven freedom. She and others preferred Satan's free-for-all version in the form of anarchy. The rest is history.

.
God help Alaska and the United States of America.  God help us all!  May He give Joe Miller the insight and strength to take the Alaskan people's case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Pray for his success. Pray that the dawning of the age of heroes and the demise of back-scratchers is near. And pray that Lisa Murkowski will repent her attack on the people of Alaska. It is a good thing when the Sifter fails in his mission.

 1. Source: The Holy Bible Douay Rheims Version

Vandals at the Gates

The rule-breakers have gone too far in Alaska’s recent elections. The subsequent outrage is palatable and will grow as my fellow Americans discover the depths to which the Murkowski crew has sunk. They have declared war and I am responding. My children and their children require no less.

These past days, I have watched Alaska’s Senator Lisa Murkowski’s despicable and unwarranted attacks on former governor, Sarah Palin. Evidently these two women have a history. It appears that attacks on Palin are diversionary tactics: they serve as cover-ups for voter ballot criminality and other malfeasance taking place behind the scenes.

Senator Lisa Murkowski has treated Alaska’s Republican Primary voters as enemies. Take a look at ciminality and what passes for a voter’s ballots in the State of Alaska.

Here

Who are the people that wanted Senator Murkowski to override the election process? I can’t say. But someone needs to conduct a forensic audit to discover who changed (stole) votes. Whose handwriting was repetitively used on many ballots?

Not to be out done by Internationalists’ scorched earth tactics, Lisa Murkowski has shown that she will eagerly go along with corruptible surrogates to achieve her fraudulent UN-American ends.

Is it possible that Lisa, a sell-out Republican, who had a noble platform to guide her, but rejected it, would think that her transgressions against the rule of the law and the people would be forgiven? Why wouldn’t she? She has succeeded and we easily forget. But, will we this time?

Dissatisfied with her alliance’s undoing of loyal Republican voters, Lisa went on to execute a scorched earth policy as she was [assigned]? to look for real or imagined enemies, and became the leftist media’s useful darling.

The media's Katie Couric et al, could not lure Sarah Palin into daffy, snippy, braggadocio, exhibited by Murkowski. Couric did all that she could to contain herself as Lisa snootily chatted on about a contrived, out-of-context diversion, ala Sarah Palin.  Here

As yet, Joe Miller had not yet said that he was requesting a recount based on evidence. The nation had turned its short attention span to matters associated with airport security's inappropriate touching and Sarah Palin. Soros must have been ecstatic.

Tonight, I wonder if our leaders are stable and competent, and can be trusted to make sound decisions for modern Alaska in the face of impending disasters, dire distractions, saber rattling with Russia and China, and a powerful native population which aligns itself with the UN.

We in Alaska are about to be tested. The test is this: enemies and their allies continue to create distractions with the intent to undo the will of the people. They did it to Sarah Palin. Joe Miller is the latest fatality of Alaska’s rough ‘n’ tumble, anti-social politics.

Looking for our weaknesses, our enemies found them with Murkowski's help, and they proceeded to undo the dream of "One," Our Senator has cynically engaged in the divisive process of terminally dividing the people along the lines of Ancients vs. Newcomers.

Are we strong, wise, competent, stable and generous enough to avoid a collision with the massive socialist/communist ship-of-state? I believe we are in trouble. Senator Murkowski hasn't protected us from a possible Collision; she is insuring one. Consequently, Joe, with his contextually driven judgment-calls, appears to be the more malleable of the two. By using her power against the Republican Primary, Lisa's flaws outweigh his.

The discord Lisa Murkowski sows is personal. It is MY vote that she and others are attempting to steal through a process of power, wealth, hurdles, and negation. In effect, her actions contravene my civil rights while she uses her immense influence with native Alaskans to diminish my effect. Shame!

- I believe that PACs and Lisa Murkowski, with the help of useful bureaucrats, acted with malice-of-forethought, to effectuate unfair outcomes in the Republican Party's Primary Election, thereby creating hurdles that effectually deny me important rights.

- Murkowski et al., have, de facto, destroyed established institutional voting practices, and, in so doing, they function unfairly as empowered bullies, who have caused the diminishment and effectiveness of my statutory voting franchise, which was achieved through a lawful legislative process.

- I am helpless to effectively fight for my established franchise and suffrage, and fear that my full citizen-rights are jeopardized and may be lost.

- I am not the sole target in this despicable process. Even if Senator Murkowski loses her race, she has significantly and capriciously harmed my potential voice, my candidate, Joe Miller.

- I believe that Senator Murkowski means to deny Mr. Joe Miller a mandate, and by extension she obstructs my influence on the legislative process. Her actions plead "Outlaw-wise," and are expressions of the same raw power currently exercised by President Barack Obama.

- Senator Murkowski works de facto to deny the nation at large an effective governing voice, and in so doing, she destroys a specific trust between herself and ”We the people," - that is - the duty of fair representation.

Comments:

Unless reasonable people act long-term to counter the Murkowski/Soros/(Social) Democrat's march to insurrection, History will record that we will have been the first State in the Union to allow entrenched socialist bureaucrats to willfully obstruct and negate the will of the Alaskan people, and by extension, the whole of the American nation. We are the sum of our parts.

How does she do it? She uses willing accomplices, including wealthy protected (corporate) “minorities: against other Alaskans.

Senator Murkowski demonstrably has broken a trust agreement with the Republican Party and me, per se, and has shown that she will cynically do so into the future.

Note: Under my given name, I voted for Senator Lisa Murkowski in previous Primary and general state elections. I voted for her father, Senator Frank Murkowski, and I did not contribute to Joe Miller's campaign. I did support Miller this time around because he appeared to be in support of the Republican party's platform. Lisa has turned too far left.

Having witnessed events as they unfolded, I will contribute to his legal fund.  It is the least that I can now do in defense of Joe Miller, and my voting rights as was intended under the Voting Rights Act.  Here  The state can in no way abridge my rights through fraud and or manipulation. It clearly appears that they have acted inappropriately, if not criminally.



Revisiting Hate Crimes Legislation

(c) August 14, 2010

 Opinion

Hate Crimes Legislation Will Give A Select Few Power

By Clotilde Frazier

This was written under my given name and was sent to Alaska’s Senator Frank Murkowski, during the Clinton administration. The question now asked is: were my concerns unfounded?

The hate crimes agenda is a political tool that undermines free speech and limits freedom of thought to a select few. As a female victim of crime, I have some thoughts about attempts to characterize certain crimes as acts of hate.

First: all crimes, past and present, leave an indelible mark. Criminal conduct effecutuates hate, anger, frustration, a feeling of helplessness, a sense of isolation, general loss, permanent emotional scarring and economic loss. Is it, therefore, possible to predict outcomes where hateful thoughts dominate? It may be possible, but a potential for a high margin of error remains.

I am asking: is it possible to dissect criminal conduct and come up with a cause with certainty? I don’t think so. Etiology is always a complex issue, one that lacks specificity because we are complicated and paradoxical beings.

When my life was threatened, I felt that it was a violent, impersonal and evil act. I faced individuals who were: 1. on a mission, 2. were looking for a scapegoat, 3. were out-of-control, 4. were power abusers, 5. were habituated criminals and political operatives, 6. were bent on using fear and intimidation as a means of destroying my right to think and speak, 7. and were known drug abusers.

Are criminal acts, then, the result of specific malevolent drives? Or are they the result of something specific that victims say or do?

I suspect that criminal acts stem from myriad convoluted causes buried in soul and psyche, and have unpredictable triggers, but I can’t prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Neither can Congress or anyone else.

I am not willing to define a so-called hate crime in qualitative terms. However, for the sake of argument, I believe hate and rage find their roots somewhere in a maze of maladaptive defense mechanisms, leaving soul and psyche malformed and undefended.

I ask Congress: can you or your fellow legislators say with indisputable certainty and specificity that there is such a thing as a “hate” crime, unique in injury that requires special legislation?

If you are certain, is your certainty such that you believe your colleagues have wisdom enough to write a law that addresses human intent and the range of chaotic human emotions that help to create intent?

Because I believe we are born flawed spirits who, nonetheless, were made in the Creator’s image, it follows that I believe that all crime is hateful, inhumane and unpredictable. But, I also think that the first victim of a crime is the perpetrator, because he or she has acquiesced to evil, placing the soul in jeopardy.

As for the proposed “Hate Law” legislation, it is frightening that ambitious leaders want to qualify crime in terms that presume to categorize an individual’s state of mind. Are we now into thought control? I pray not, the possibilities are too frightful.

To grow morally, my conscience must be unfettered by man-made restrictions. I am obliged, by moral law and conscience, to love God and humankind with certainty, wisdom, strength and passion. At the same time, I am to hate destructive (evil) conduct with equal ardor. To do otherwise would be lukewarm and essentially dishonest.

If conduct is despicable, I am bound to say so and offer alternatives. The law does that every day. If I give voice to my rational thoughts, are the President and his cohorts proposing to legislatively wash my brain and conscience through coercive law? It sounds like it to me.

In Communist countries, like laws ultimately led to many Gulags and resulted in the engineered death of the undefended, as well as the politically and religiously incorrect. Estimates of atrocities are astounding and give credence to my greatest fears, especially when I consider that no one has proposed that we punish the perpetrators through an international Tribunal.

History has shown that totalitarianism’s Socialistic construct is not benign. Records provide irrefutable evidence that Communism, through its socialistic face, became a deadly force in the hands of those able to grab, abuse, and hold power.

A new book proves my point. Using documents of record, the multiple authors of, The Black Book of Communism, expose the horrific incremental excesses of totalitarian Communist Socialism, wherever it has planted roots. Throughout the Communist empire, documents attest to the deaths of over one hundred-million hapless people, whose main offense was to think and speak in ways different from power holders.

We are not there yet, but incrementally we are well on our way to fully yielding to tyrannical powers. We are being surrounded by evil doers as mindless distractions lull feckless consciences to sleep.

We, the people, have seen the results of Machiavellian machinations which attack freedoms, including speech. In effect, we have been blindly led to become a brave, now, increasingly engineered captive and servile people. Doesn’t the master tell the enslaved how to think and act?

Presidential governance by fiat, with the assistance of the judiciary and legislature, threatens freedom and divides the nation by design. Independent, free men and women are just too difficult to govern (oppress) in a brave, new, one-world order.

However, deep-structure, it is the tyranny of the minority that threatens us through provocation, excess, selfishness and abuse of power. It is the tyranny of the demagogue and restive special interest groups that force us down destruction’s path. We need something better.

We need a moral imperative, built upon balanced self-examination, self-discipline, responsible conduct, knowledge, truth, and the freedom to speak openly, reasonably and unselfishly to leaders et al. There is both experience and an historic precedence for my views. It was the grassroots moral core of this nation that freed the oppressed from slavery and gender abuse. It was that moral core that spoke out against all forms of tyranny, and in time the core was followed by the elite power holders. By the grace of God, I was formed by that core and acted accordingly.

I ask you, my representatives, to effectively stand against the proposed Hate Crimes Act, and its sister Employment Act, which promotes some individuals, while attacking others through false and bad law, with bad outcomes. Entrapment awaits us if we hesitate. The force of the Communist/Socialist experience is full upon us in all its overt/covert forms.

Should you fail to successfully squelch this attempt to set the stage for a Socialist One-World Order, with the so-called Man of Destiny as dictator, your children’s children and mine will live or die cursing your lack of will, greed, insight, and cowardliness.

WHO ARE THE COWARDS THAT WOULD ORDER THIS NATION TO PAY FOR THE DEATHS OF OUR CHILDREN?

To: President Obama:
Re: HR 3962

Re: proposal to place into law abortion knowingly paid for by taxpayer's money.

From: C. F. a citizen of the State of Alaska, in the United States of America, a Representative, Constitutional Republic 

So, Mr. President, you want to kill the babies and have us share in the criminal massacre through taxation.  I  hear you Obama, now hear me: not our babies, not my money, not my country.

 As for the rest of the cowardly, who encourage the killing of babies through surrogates, but will not fight an equally armed enemy, I fear for your immortal souls. 

It is a hateful law you and your lackies would create. Per your instructions: "I resist you to your face."  All of you who would harm this nation and its children are a species apart.

Congress: disband if you must. Resist! Kill this fraudulent health-care [sic] legislation.

My God, Mercy.
MGMers

Viva Cristo Rey!
 


A voice in Rama, was heard, lamentation and great mourning; Rachel bewailing her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.   Matt. 2:18